1 00:00:09,830 --> 00:00:08,390 hi everyone alex karras here from 2 00:00:12,080 --> 00:00:09,840 skeptic oh just wanted to give you a 3 00:00:15,079 --> 00:00:12,090 little youtube introduction to this 4 00:00:18,590 --> 00:00:15,089 interview that i recently published with 5 00:00:21,529 --> 00:00:18,600 dr. David Bentley Hart and here it is 6 00:00:22,849 --> 00:00:21,539 episode 298 really really interesting 7 00:00:25,429 --> 00:00:22,859 guy was really looking forward to 8 00:00:29,060 --> 00:00:25,439 talking to him if you are looking for 9 00:00:32,060 --> 00:00:29,070 someone to give just stunningly 10 00:00:35,889 --> 00:00:32,070 brilliant complete philosophical 11 00:00:39,819 --> 00:00:35,899 dismantling of atheism and this crazy 12 00:00:42,139 --> 00:00:39,829 materialism that is so much a part of 13 00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:42,149 science then you're gonna find nobody 14 00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:45,210 better than dr. David Bentley Hart and I 15 00:00:51,160 --> 00:00:47,010 in it and I enjoy talking to him about 16 00:00:54,650 --> 00:00:51,170 that of course he is also a Christian 17 00:00:57,229 --> 00:00:54,660 which I think poses some problems given 18 00:01:00,110 --> 00:00:57,239 the craziness of the baby Jesus 19 00:01:02,380 --> 00:01:00,120 hypothesis and the rest of that but we 20 00:01:08,210 --> 00:01:02,390 talked a little bit about that 21 00:01:11,090 --> 00:01:08,220 here is dr. dr. Hart again really bright 22 00:01:12,109 --> 00:01:11,100 guy interesting guy to talk to so you 23 00:01:16,100 --> 00:01:12,119 know one of the things we talked about 24 00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:16,110 was this idea of atheism and it reminded 25 00:01:20,749 --> 00:01:18,210 me of this energy I did with atheist 26 00:01:23,899 --> 00:01:20,759 John Loftus a while back you know where 27 00:01:26,780 --> 00:01:23,909 you kind of push the philosophical part 28 00:01:29,929 --> 00:01:26,790 of the atheist position with these folks 29 00:01:33,109 --> 00:01:29,939 and they just kind of yeah I'm a 30 00:01:36,200 --> 00:01:33,119 biological robot and a meaningless if 31 00:01:39,260 --> 00:01:36,210 that makes any sense but you know then 32 00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:39,270 the other thing I came back to dr. Hart 33 00:01:44,420 --> 00:01:41,930 with that I think is interesting is that 34 00:01:45,109 --> 00:01:44,430 you know if you really pull that apart I 35 00:01:49,609 --> 00:01:45,119 mean sure 36 00:01:51,920 --> 00:01:49,619 atheism is dumb philosophically but it 37 00:01:56,450 --> 00:01:51,930 is somewhat of a reactionary position to 38 00:01:59,649 --> 00:01:56,460 to the craziness of evangelical 39 00:02:03,950 --> 00:01:59,659 Christianity and the crazy you know 40 00:02:06,859 --> 00:02:03,960 books left behind books apocalyptic 41 00:02:08,540 --> 00:02:06,869 nonsense and case for Christ and all 42 00:02:10,699 --> 00:02:08,550 that stuff this really doesn't hold up 43 00:02:13,100 --> 00:02:10,709 to scholarship either so you know we 44 00:02:13,910 --> 00:02:13,110 talked about that we talked about is 45 00:02:15,860 --> 00:02:13,920 this 46 00:02:20,540 --> 00:02:15,870 reactionary position and should we have 47 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:20,550 some compassion for the atheists given 48 00:02:26,530 --> 00:02:21,690 that you know a lot of people have been 49 00:02:29,960 --> 00:02:26,540 wounded badly by Christianity and you 50 00:02:32,210 --> 00:02:29,970 know what would you do if if you were 51 00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:32,220 one of those people that were or 52 00:02:36,830 --> 00:02:34,290 somebody in your family was molested by 53 00:02:40,100 --> 00:02:36,840 a Catholic priest or something like that 54 00:02:42,350 --> 00:02:40,110 I think you'd go running to atheists or 55 00:02:44,330 --> 00:02:42,360 someone who would kind of have a 56 00:02:45,650 --> 00:02:44,340 different point of view no the other 57 00:02:49,130 --> 00:02:45,660 thing that we talked about in this 58 00:02:51,350 --> 00:02:49,140 interview is kind of along this idea of 59 00:02:53,180 --> 00:02:51,360 you know is Christianity worth saving 60 00:02:57,890 --> 00:02:53,190 kind of thing something that I talked 61 00:03:00,830 --> 00:02:57,900 with mark Vernon about so I think you'll 62 00:03:04,520 --> 00:03:00,840 enjoy this I hope you will if you like 63 00:03:07,580 --> 00:03:04,530 these kind of topics I do a lot of 64 00:03:10,789 --> 00:03:07,590 skeptical listeners do not this one only 65 00:03:14,300 --> 00:03:10,799 got eighty to shears but I think the 66 00:03:16,699 --> 00:03:14,310 issues of spirituality are central to 67 00:03:20,810 --> 00:03:16,709 consciousness science because of course 68 00:03:22,310 --> 00:03:20,820 once you understand that the best 69 00:03:25,180 --> 00:03:22,320 scientific evidence we have suggests 70 00:03:28,009 --> 00:03:25,190 that consciousness is not limited to our 71 00:03:29,449 --> 00:03:28,019 brains it's not a brain based thing it's 72 00:03:31,849 --> 00:03:29,459 somehow extends beyond it's not 73 00:03:33,890 --> 00:03:31,859 somewhere extends beyond death then I 74 00:03:37,250 --> 00:03:33,900 think you get into all these issues of 75 00:03:39,620 --> 00:03:37,260 spirituality and I enjoyed talking about 76 00:03:43,569 --> 00:03:39,630 some of those with dr. David Bentley 77 00:03:46,099 --> 00:03:43,579 Hart I hope you like this interview on 78 00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:46,109 this episode of skeptic Oh 79 00:03:50,990 --> 00:03:48,650 so I think when your confidence in 80 00:03:53,539 --> 00:03:51,000 materialism wanes a little bit 81 00:03:54,380 --> 00:03:53,549 I think that's an opening for what 82 00:03:58,039 --> 00:03:54,390 you're talking about 83 00:03:59,809 --> 00:03:58,049 no you may be right but again let me put 84 00:04:03,530 --> 00:03:59,819 it this way there's a certain sort of 85 00:04:04,910 --> 00:04:03,540 psychology involved here that can erect 86 00:04:06,800 --> 00:04:04,920 defenses against that 87 00:04:10,370 --> 00:04:06,810 yeah if you can amass if you can 88 00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:10,380 accumulate sufficient evidence you know 89 00:04:14,449 --> 00:04:11,850 that they should call into question 90 00:04:17,229 --> 00:04:14,459 these easy and materialist assumptions 91 00:04:20,840 --> 00:04:17,239 yes sure that was a clarifying effect 92 00:04:23,630 --> 00:04:20,850 still again my interests are in in the 93 00:04:26,900 --> 00:04:23,640 whole activity set of logical 94 00:04:30,410 --> 00:04:26,910 assumptions underlying naturalism that 95 00:04:33,100 --> 00:04:30,420 accord with any experience at all not 96 00:04:48,280 --> 00:04:33,110 just extraordinary experiences 97 00:04:52,130 --> 00:04:50,480 welcome to skeptic Oh where we explore 98 00:04:54,440 --> 00:04:52,140 controversial science with leading 99 00:04:56,660 --> 00:04:54,450 researchers thinkers and their critics 100 00:04:59,300 --> 00:04:56,670 I'm your host Aleksic harris and on this 101 00:05:01,460 --> 00:04:59,310 episode and episode i've been looking 102 00:05:03,260 --> 00:05:01,470 forward to bringing to you for a while 103 00:05:05,930 --> 00:05:03,270 it's one that I really had to prepare 104 00:05:07,820 --> 00:05:05,940 for a lot you suggested dr. David 105 00:05:10,880 --> 00:05:07,830 Bentley Hart and I'm really glad you did 106 00:05:13,310 --> 00:05:10,890 but if you dig into his work one of the 107 00:05:16,250 --> 00:05:13,320 things you realize is that this is a 108 00:05:17,690 --> 00:05:16,260 very smart guy someone you want to be on 109 00:05:21,020 --> 00:05:17,700 your toes for when you're talking to 110 00:05:24,020 --> 00:05:21,030 them and if you doubt me then go check 111 00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:24,030 out some of the debates slash dialogues 112 00:05:30,080 --> 00:05:27,090 he's had with various atheist secular 113 00:05:32,990 --> 00:05:30,090 materialist types out there they are 114 00:05:35,060 --> 00:05:33,000 cringe worthy if you know what I mean 115 00:05:36,860 --> 00:05:35,070 so I prepared quite a bit for this 116 00:05:40,840 --> 00:05:36,870 interview and the other reason I did is 117 00:05:42,590 --> 00:05:40,850 because dr. Hart and I share a similar 118 00:05:45,470 --> 00:05:42,600 religious background 119 00:05:47,660 --> 00:05:45,480 he's Eastern Orthodox and I grew up in a 120 00:05:49,760 --> 00:05:47,670 Greek Orthodox Church in wil Manila Noi 121 00:05:52,060 --> 00:05:49,770 outside of Chicago where my brother and 122 00:05:55,190 --> 00:05:52,070 I would squirm around in the 123 00:05:58,190 --> 00:05:55,200 unbelievably uncomfortable wooden pews 124 00:05:59,840 --> 00:05:58,200 that they had until my very Greek very 125 00:06:01,190 --> 00:05:59,850 religious grandmother would be so 126 00:06:03,650 --> 00:06:01,200 frustrated that she would reach over 127 00:06:05,600 --> 00:06:03,660 with the just the tip of a straight pin 128 00:06:07,490 --> 00:06:05,610 and stick it in her and although that 129 00:06:11,180 --> 00:06:07,500 sounds really cruel it worked we didn't 130 00:06:13,100 --> 00:06:11,190 squirm a lot after that so that was my 131 00:06:14,570 --> 00:06:13,110 religious background as a kid and even 132 00:06:17,210 --> 00:06:14,580 though I'm not a Christian anymore 133 00:06:20,780 --> 00:06:17,220 one thing that's lingered from that 134 00:06:23,480 --> 00:06:20,790 whole experience is the question of what 135 00:06:25,460 --> 00:06:23,490 was really going on me 136 00:06:26,840 --> 00:06:25,470 why were these smart otherwise 137 00:06:28,370 --> 00:06:26,850 intelligent people and I know they are 138 00:06:31,010 --> 00:06:28,380 because I knew them outside of church 139 00:06:33,320 --> 00:06:31,020 why were they sitting there watching 140 00:06:36,230 --> 00:06:33,330 these grown men walk around with these 141 00:06:38,510 --> 00:06:36,240 huge icons and gold encrusted robes 142 00:06:41,120 --> 00:06:38,520 while they're swinging all this incense 143 00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:41,130 I mean why are they sitting through all 144 00:06:46,190 --> 00:06:43,530 this nonsense and why I may not have 145 00:06:48,560 --> 00:06:46,200 gotten a direct answer to that question 146 00:06:50,270 --> 00:06:48,570 during this dialogue with dr. David 147 00:06:53,510 --> 00:06:50,280 Bentley Hart I did get a pretty 148 00:06:57,950 --> 00:06:53,520 satisfying one because dr. Hart is the 149 00:07:00,080 --> 00:06:57,960 embodiment of the intellectual spiritual 150 00:07:02,659 --> 00:07:00,090 religious seeker now you're not gonna 151 00:07:05,540 --> 00:07:02,669 hear engaged in silly apologetics about 152 00:07:07,820 --> 00:07:05,550 empty tombs and baby Jesus and all the 153 00:07:10,129 --> 00:07:07,830 rest of that nonsense but what you will 154 00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:10,139 hear is someone who's thought deeply 155 00:07:16,790 --> 00:07:13,770 about the big big questions who are we 156 00:07:19,580 --> 00:07:16,800 why are we here and how do we relate to 157 00:07:22,010 --> 00:07:19,590 that ever-present little voice inside of 158 00:07:24,020 --> 00:07:22,020 our head these the questions I care 159 00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:24,030 about these are the questions I sought 160 00:07:28,580 --> 00:07:26,250 to answer with skeptical from the very 161 00:07:32,659 --> 00:07:28,590 beginning and these are the questions I 162 00:07:34,279 --> 00:07:32,669 think dr. Hart is after is well so I 163 00:07:36,770 --> 00:07:34,289 really enjoyed this dialogue we talked 164 00:07:38,900 --> 00:07:36,780 about a number of topics including the 165 00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:38,910 wacky metaphysics of no metaphysics that 166 00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:41,610 is atheism and has embedded itself in 167 00:07:46,159 --> 00:07:44,130 the secular / atheistic science that we 168 00:07:48,140 --> 00:07:46,169 encounter but we also look behind that 169 00:07:50,689 --> 00:07:48,150 and talk about what might really be 170 00:07:52,879 --> 00:07:50,699 going on with atheism and with 171 00:07:54,890 --> 00:07:52,889 Christianity and then finally under the 172 00:07:58,070 --> 00:07:54,900 end we get to some really good stuff 173 00:08:00,740 --> 00:07:58,080 consciousness bliss and what all this 174 00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:00,750 stuff might really be about it's a 175 00:08:05,300 --> 00:08:03,330 dialogue I really enjoyed having and one 176 00:08:21,410 --> 00:08:05,310 that I hope you like too here's dr. 177 00:08:26,510 --> 00:08:23,880 today we welcome theologian philosopher 178 00:08:29,340 --> 00:08:26,520 author and I got it add the label 179 00:08:31,710 --> 00:08:29,350 intellectual in there because dr. David 180 00:08:34,920 --> 00:08:31,720 Bentley Hart certainly does remind us of 181 00:08:37,740 --> 00:08:34,930 what it means to be a true intellectual 182 00:08:40,320 --> 00:08:37,750 dr. Hart is the author of several books 183 00:08:42,120 --> 00:08:40,330 including atheist delusions a book that 184 00:08:45,360 --> 00:08:42,130 was awarded the michael ramsey prize in 185 00:08:49,680 --> 00:08:45,370 theology and his latest the experience 186 00:08:52,170 --> 00:08:49,690 of God being consciousness bliss 187 00:08:53,240 --> 00:08:52,180 David welcomed a skeptic oh thanks so 188 00:08:56,010 --> 00:08:53,250 much for joining me 189 00:08:58,680 --> 00:08:56,020 thanks for inviting me first off I have 190 00:09:01,170 --> 00:08:58,690 to tell you I have had a great time 191 00:09:03,660 --> 00:09:01,180 digging into your work and I have to 192 00:09:05,430 --> 00:09:03,670 thank first off a couple of skeptical 193 00:09:07,650 --> 00:09:05,440 listeners in particular marker reached 194 00:09:10,740 --> 00:09:07,660 out and set up this interview it's been 195 00:09:13,050 --> 00:09:10,750 great for me I'm still I think trying to 196 00:09:15,810 --> 00:09:13,060 get my arms around everything you do so 197 00:09:17,700 --> 00:09:15,820 forgive me your writing is extraordinary 198 00:09:20,430 --> 00:09:17,710 it's a little dense I found myself 199 00:09:22,740 --> 00:09:20,440 jumping over to the dictionary more than 200 00:09:24,990 --> 00:09:22,750 a time or two but that's fun that's 201 00:09:27,510 --> 00:09:25,000 great and anyone will find well you know 202 00:09:33,030 --> 00:09:27,520 Goethe said it's a poor writer within 203 00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:33,040 the lexicon can keep pace love it well 204 00:09:37,680 --> 00:09:35,890 as an introduction to where you're 205 00:09:39,720 --> 00:09:37,690 coming from for my audience for the 206 00:09:41,340 --> 00:09:39,730 skeptical audience one of the things 207 00:09:44,810 --> 00:09:41,350 that comes through loud and clear is 208 00:09:48,570 --> 00:09:44,820 this most complete and eloquent 209 00:09:51,240 --> 00:09:48,580 dismantling of this crazy scientific 210 00:09:54,290 --> 00:09:51,250 materialism we talk so much about you 211 00:09:57,660 --> 00:09:54,300 right and let me read this for folks 212 00:09:59,280 --> 00:09:57,670 naturalism that is this idea also called 213 00:10:00,720 --> 00:09:59,290 materialism that we're all biological 214 00:10:03,330 --> 00:10:00,730 robots in a meaningless universe 215 00:10:05,820 --> 00:10:03,340 basically what naturalism means is a 216 00:10:08,310 --> 00:10:05,830 picture of the whole of reality that 217 00:10:11,100 --> 00:10:08,320 cannot according to its own intrinsic 218 00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:11,110 premises address the being of the whole 219 00:10:15,240 --> 00:10:13,330 and I love this next one it's a 220 00:10:18,030 --> 00:10:15,250 metaphysics of the rejection of 221 00:10:20,670 --> 00:10:18,040 metaphysics a transcendental certainty 222 00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:20,680 of the impossibility of transcendental 223 00:10:26,970 --> 00:10:24,010 truth and so requires an act of so pure 224 00:10:29,639 --> 00:10:26,980 credence logically immune from any 225 00:10:31,889 --> 00:10:29,649 verification brilliant stuff 226 00:10:37,139 --> 00:10:31,899 can you elaborate just a little bit on 227 00:10:41,129 --> 00:10:37,149 that I suppose I could yeah well I mean 228 00:10:45,509 --> 00:10:41,139 naturalism is is in a sense its own 229 00:10:50,040 --> 00:10:45,519 worst enemy because it's especially in 230 00:10:55,739 --> 00:10:50,050 the Anglophone world generally advanced 231 00:10:58,439 --> 00:10:55,749 as as a concurrent philosophy of the 232 00:11:04,499 --> 00:10:58,449 causal closure of the physical of the 233 00:11:08,699 --> 00:11:04,509 impossibility of thought reaching beyond 234 00:11:10,799 --> 00:11:08,709 the boundaries of natural cause Asian as 235 00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:10,809 we you know as we understand that 236 00:11:17,699 --> 00:11:12,610 Charlie the modern world we tend to 237 00:11:19,590 --> 00:11:17,709 think of nature as a result of of ideas 238 00:11:23,569 --> 00:11:19,600 that go back to the 17th century as 239 00:11:27,389 --> 00:11:23,579 meaning unguided mechanistic in 240 00:11:31,109 --> 00:11:27,399 processes that that yield as the residue 241 00:11:33,169 --> 00:11:31,119 of interactions and nutrition's and so 242 00:11:37,079 --> 00:11:33,179 forth they an ordered poem 243 00:11:40,049 --> 00:11:37,089 the problem is with naturalism is that 244 00:11:41,939 --> 00:11:40,059 it rules out of course all the Vantage's 245 00:11:49,619 --> 00:11:41,949 that it requires in order to certify 246 00:11:52,110 --> 00:11:49,629 itself that is it tells us that it tells 247 00:11:54,210 --> 00:11:52,120 us what we can't know but can only do so 248 00:11:55,889 --> 00:11:54,220 from the position beyond the totality of 249 00:11:58,769 --> 00:11:55,899 nature which is precisely the position 250 00:12:00,720 --> 00:11:58,779 it claims we can never occupy it so I 251 00:12:02,249 --> 00:12:00,730 think that's what that you'd have to 252 00:12:04,769 --> 00:12:02,259 remind me of the whole context of that 253 00:12:06,210 --> 00:12:04,779 sentence incidentally because when you 254 00:12:09,480 --> 00:12:06,220 write a lot you tend to forget what 255 00:12:11,280 --> 00:12:09,490 you've written where and when no I think 256 00:12:15,119 --> 00:12:11,290 you've I think you've captured it quite 257 00:12:18,689 --> 00:12:15,129 well both in that sentence or two and in 258 00:12:20,669 --> 00:12:18,699 your explanation of it I love the the 259 00:12:23,549 --> 00:12:20,679 metaphysics of the rejection of 260 00:12:26,069 --> 00:12:23,559 metaphysics because I think you know in 261 00:12:29,549 --> 00:12:26,079 in typical kind of new atheist fashion 262 00:12:32,850 --> 00:12:29,559 when you mention that their logical 263 00:12:34,499 --> 00:12:32,860 argument rests on metaphysics they often 264 00:12:36,900 --> 00:12:34,509 have this kinda curious look on their 265 00:12:38,789 --> 00:12:36,910 face like no no no no we're not into 266 00:12:41,819 --> 00:12:38,799 metaphysics you're into metaphysics it's 267 00:12:44,699 --> 00:12:41,829 like well no that's a metaphysical claim 268 00:12:46,139 --> 00:12:44,709 that you're making so III think you do a 269 00:12:48,569 --> 00:12:46,149 wonderful job of that not well it's 270 00:12:51,809 --> 00:12:48,579 inevitably so isn't it and it's not just 271 00:12:53,610 --> 00:12:51,819 the luck that their logic and quite and 272 00:12:56,610 --> 00:12:53,620 that's a rather generous term to use 273 00:13:00,030 --> 00:12:56,620 quite often but but just that the 274 00:13:02,189 --> 00:13:00,040 picture of reality itself is is a 275 00:13:05,549 --> 00:13:02,199 metaphysical dogma not a metaphysical 276 00:13:09,179 --> 00:13:05,559 system even right it's an assertion that 277 00:13:10,909 --> 00:13:09,189 yeah you know so I tell you what I what 278 00:13:15,600 --> 00:13:10,919 I'd like to do I actually have five 279 00:13:17,909 --> 00:13:15,610 questions for you and they're a little 280 00:13:20,759 --> 00:13:17,919 bit ok but don't ask anything about the 281 00:13:23,039 --> 00:13:20,769 my my experiences in Malaysia I'd like 282 00:13:27,749 --> 00:13:23,049 to keep that veiled in obscurity ok I 283 00:13:29,819 --> 00:13:27,759 have six questions so we're gonna kind 284 00:13:31,470 --> 00:13:29,829 of bounce around I'll try and frame each 285 00:13:33,059 --> 00:13:31,480 one and then you know maybe we'll 286 00:13:36,259 --> 00:13:33,069 publish each one of them separately I 287 00:13:40,169 --> 00:13:36,269 don't know but the first has to do with 288 00:13:42,389 --> 00:13:40,179 atheist reactionary ISM if you will I 289 00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:42,399 don't not sure that's a word but you 290 00:13:47,639 --> 00:13:45,370 know you provide this searing attack of 291 00:13:51,299 --> 00:13:47,649 atheists that anyone who Tunes into in 292 00:13:53,129 --> 00:13:51,309 your videos on YouTube it's just it's 293 00:13:55,590 --> 00:13:53,139 just delightful stuff to listen to it's 294 00:13:57,329 --> 00:13:55,600 so fun to listen to and it's also packed 295 00:14:05,780 --> 00:13:57,339 with a lot of good points let me play 296 00:14:08,819 --> 00:14:05,790 folks here a clip they put it very 297 00:14:11,519 --> 00:14:08,829 simply and I think with absolute 298 00:14:15,840 --> 00:14:11,529 objectivity their books are 299 00:14:18,960 --> 00:14:15,850 excruciatingly lately and when I first 300 00:14:22,889 --> 00:14:18,970 read them I have to admit that I was 301 00:14:24,960 --> 00:14:22,899 just astonished that any excitement 302 00:14:28,049 --> 00:14:24,970 could be generated by books that were so 303 00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:28,059 incoherent and that that were had such 304 00:14:35,280 --> 00:14:32,370 an evidence of historical ignorance 305 00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:35,290 philosophical clumsiness sanctimony 306 00:14:43,319 --> 00:14:36,490 viciousness 307 00:14:46,139 --> 00:14:43,329 constant through all of them and and but 308 00:14:47,570 --> 00:14:46,149 ultimately inanity the these were vated 309 00:14:51,030 --> 00:14:47,580 books they were they were 310 00:14:52,320 --> 00:14:51,040 faulty books or books that are the don't 311 00:14:53,850 --> 00:14:52,330 rise above the level of light 312 00:14:57,300 --> 00:14:53,860 entertainment for people who get a 313 00:14:59,090 --> 00:14:57,310 thrill from being insulting and that was 314 00:15:02,120 --> 00:14:59,100 from an interview you gave after 315 00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:02,130 publishing your book atheist delusions 316 00:15:07,950 --> 00:15:04,810 with it's not my title I always have to 317 00:15:09,480 --> 00:15:07,960 stick that in my title going that you 318 00:15:13,170 --> 00:15:09,490 have to live with it don't you 319 00:15:15,720 --> 00:15:13,180 so here I guess is my question it's hard 320 00:15:19,050 --> 00:15:15,730 for me to argue with the main thrust of 321 00:15:21,420 --> 00:15:19,060 what you're saying and I've done 322 00:15:23,370 --> 00:15:21,430 probably two dozen shows on atheism and 323 00:15:26,220 --> 00:15:23,380 interviewed so many of the prominent 324 00:15:28,080 --> 00:15:26,230 members of the Atheist community that I 325 00:15:31,440 --> 00:15:28,090 get where you're coming from but I also 326 00:15:33,900 --> 00:15:31,450 feel like my position visa v the Atheist 327 00:15:36,690 --> 00:15:33,910 has softened a little bit i mean first 328 00:15:39,750 --> 00:15:36,700 off isn't this new a theism nonsense 329 00:15:41,160 --> 00:15:39,760 really a reactionary position so you 330 00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:41,170 know they might not have your 331 00:15:45,300 --> 00:15:43,330 intellectual muscle David and they might 332 00:15:47,340 --> 00:15:45,310 not and they might be somewhat of knit 333 00:15:51,410 --> 00:15:47,350 wits about philosophy like you point out 334 00:15:55,610 --> 00:15:51,420 but they're reacting to the day-to-day 335 00:15:58,470 --> 00:15:55,620 idiocy we get from some of the American 336 00:16:00,990 --> 00:15:58,480 evangelical community I mean just throw 337 00:16:03,840 --> 00:16:01,000 stroll through the bestseller list of 338 00:16:06,450 --> 00:16:03,850 Christian books on Amazon you know the 339 00:16:09,930 --> 00:16:06,460 apocalyptic left behind books and the 340 00:16:12,660 --> 00:16:09,940 simple-minded apologetics of what's that 341 00:16:16,110 --> 00:16:12,670 book a case for Christ I mean these are 342 00:16:18,420 --> 00:16:16,120 not exactly everything but I can 343 00:16:21,390 --> 00:16:18,430 probably guess what it's like um like 344 00:16:24,300 --> 00:16:21,400 these are not towering tombs Ernest I 345 00:16:27,960 --> 00:16:24,310 think if you've read any of that before 346 00:16:31,260 --> 00:16:27,970 I think you you can say fairly I'm just 347 00:16:33,810 --> 00:16:31,270 as hard on on those people even if 348 00:16:36,360 --> 00:16:33,820 they're not the object of what I'm 349 00:16:38,910 --> 00:16:36,370 writing about I so what about the 350 00:16:40,800 --> 00:16:38,920 atheist as a reaction to that can't we 351 00:16:43,740 --> 00:16:40,810 kind of understand where they're coming 352 00:16:47,820 --> 00:16:43,750 from oh well it depends I mean it 353 00:16:49,710 --> 00:16:47,830 depends on whom you're talking about and 354 00:16:54,450 --> 00:16:49,720 don't leave out the other thing they're 355 00:16:58,230 --> 00:16:54,460 reacting again like against is the rise 356 00:16:58,750 --> 00:16:58,240 in in violence perpetrated in the name 357 00:17:11,079 --> 00:16:58,760 of 358 00:17:13,390 --> 00:17:11,089 specifically as long as well so you know 359 00:17:15,429 --> 00:17:13,400 there are all sorts of reactions and 360 00:17:17,590 --> 00:17:15,439 reactionary currencies but but you have 361 00:17:20,049 --> 00:17:17,600 to treat it author by author in the case 362 00:17:22,590 --> 00:17:20,059 of Richard Dawkins I think you could be 363 00:17:26,079 --> 00:17:22,600 overly generous there it's true that 364 00:17:28,539 --> 00:17:26,089 that he's frustrated by six-day 365 00:17:30,580 --> 00:17:28,549 creationists but then again he goes out 366 00:17:34,650 --> 00:17:30,590 of his way to seek them out and refuses 367 00:17:37,570 --> 00:17:34,660 to engage an argument with persons of 368 00:17:39,640 --> 00:17:37,580 more sophisticated philosophical or 369 00:17:43,060 --> 00:17:39,650 theological or historical training and 370 00:17:45,510 --> 00:17:43,070 at that point he looks you given that 371 00:17:49,900 --> 00:17:45,520 there's something opportunistic in his 372 00:17:52,120 --> 00:17:49,910 reactions right he could if he wanted 373 00:17:54,039 --> 00:17:52,130 and he brags about this a talks you know 374 00:17:57,100 --> 00:17:54,049 if he thinks he's going to the belly of 375 00:18:01,169 --> 00:17:57,110 the beast when in fact he's dealing with 376 00:18:04,270 --> 00:18:01,179 a very specific socio-economic cultural 377 00:18:07,720 --> 00:18:04,280 reality situated largely in the United 378 00:18:10,570 --> 00:18:07,730 States if not exclusively and he is 379 00:18:13,270 --> 00:18:10,580 clever enough to know that he's not 380 00:18:14,440 --> 00:18:13,280 really astute enough philosophically or 381 00:18:17,350 --> 00:18:14,450 good enough on his feet 382 00:18:20,680 --> 00:18:17,360 that he could enter into debate publicly 383 00:18:22,630 --> 00:18:20,690 with serious interlocutors and come out 384 00:18:25,150 --> 00:18:22,640 looking good and the few times he has 385 00:18:28,200 --> 00:18:25,160 done that he has you know he's not like 386 00:18:31,270 --> 00:18:28,210 Jerry Coyne sort of his American 387 00:18:33,039 --> 00:18:31,280 derivative lesser lesser derivative but 388 00:18:34,600 --> 00:18:33,049 ok you know what was the problem with 389 00:18:35,980 --> 00:18:34,610 point is he doesn't really he he 390 00:18:38,409 --> 00:18:35,990 actually doesn't know what he doesn't 391 00:18:40,900 --> 00:18:38,419 know and so he does weighed in and he 392 00:18:42,430 --> 00:18:40,910 does make a fool of himself and the good 393 00:18:45,010 --> 00:18:42,440 and the good thing about that is he's 394 00:18:47,230 --> 00:18:45,020 just stepped back and let him go but 395 00:18:49,120 --> 00:18:47,240 Dawkins I don't know if Dawkins is 396 00:18:50,380 --> 00:18:49,130 reactionary in the same way Christopher 397 00:18:56,020 --> 00:18:50,390 Hitchens 398 00:18:58,570 --> 00:18:56,030 alas departed was a real moralist I mean 399 00:19:01,240 --> 00:18:58,580 that this is true and though he didn't 400 00:19:04,390 --> 00:19:01,250 have any great speculative gifts I mean 401 00:19:06,520 --> 00:19:04,400 basically he was a journalist and when 402 00:19:08,560 --> 00:19:06,530 he touched on philosophical or 403 00:19:11,020 --> 00:19:08,570 speculative issues he it was clear that 404 00:19:11,350 --> 00:19:11,030 he was very much out of his depth and he 405 00:19:13,150 --> 00:19:11,360 was 406 00:19:16,330 --> 00:19:13,160 to rush by them as quickly as possible 407 00:19:18,430 --> 00:19:16,340 but of them all he was the most 408 00:19:22,390 --> 00:19:18,440 respectable because there was a sort of 409 00:19:25,720 --> 00:19:22,400 intense moral seriousness there that 410 00:19:27,640 --> 00:19:25,730 sometimes got veiled behind the the 411 00:19:30,940 --> 00:19:27,650 character he created for himself in 412 00:19:33,880 --> 00:19:30,950 public and in fact there was supposed to 413 00:19:35,260 --> 00:19:33,890 be a debate between him and me I think 414 00:19:37,390 --> 00:19:35,270 it was gonna be a Columbia I don't 415 00:19:40,210 --> 00:19:37,400 remember the details and and that was 416 00:19:41,830 --> 00:19:40,220 being set up just at the time his you 417 00:19:43,990 --> 00:19:41,840 know he felt very ill and his cancer 418 00:19:49,539 --> 00:19:44,000 misdiagnosed and I would have enjoyed 419 00:19:51,370 --> 00:19:49,549 that debate for one thing it would have 420 00:19:54,220 --> 00:19:51,380 given me a chance to see if the Jack 421 00:19:56,919 --> 00:19:54,230 Daniels and in the coffee cup was this 422 00:20:01,930 --> 00:19:56,929 true or urban legend but the other thing 423 00:20:05,919 --> 00:20:01,940 is that even even if you you know there 424 00:20:07,570 --> 00:20:05,929 were things he was reacting against of a 425 00:20:11,770 --> 00:20:07,580 different not necessarily the ones 426 00:20:12,909 --> 00:20:11,780 you're thinking of he actually but there 427 00:20:17,669 --> 00:20:12,919 were there was a certain moral 428 00:20:20,049 --> 00:20:17,679 seriousness there I again it depends on 429 00:20:22,120 --> 00:20:20,059 which New Atheists are talking about 430 00:20:23,830 --> 00:20:22,130 Dennett Daniel Dennett is for a long 431 00:20:26,289 --> 00:20:23,840 time than engaged in a philosophical 432 00:20:29,230 --> 00:20:26,299 project of his own that I I think is 433 00:20:32,590 --> 00:20:29,240 fundamentally incoherent right but what 434 00:20:35,680 --> 00:20:32,600 is he reacting against I don't know his 435 00:20:38,020 --> 00:20:35,690 his concern his his passions seem to be 436 00:20:41,289 --> 00:20:38,030 rooted much more deeply than them sort 437 00:20:43,120 --> 00:20:41,299 of frustration I think they are rooted 438 00:20:46,060 --> 00:20:43,130 deeply and I think that that kind of 439 00:20:47,770 --> 00:20:46,070 leads into my second question is is it 440 00:20:50,799 --> 00:20:47,780 what really is at play for a lot of 441 00:20:53,110 --> 00:20:50,809 these folks is a deep wounding that's 442 00:20:55,450 --> 00:20:53,120 been done by Christianity that's never 443 00:20:57,130 --> 00:20:55,460 kind of brought to the surface so again 444 00:20:59,380 --> 00:20:57,140 you know we can call the logic 445 00:21:01,870 --> 00:20:59,390 incoherent and they're crappy 446 00:21:03,730 --> 00:21:01,880 metaphysics but if you have a family 447 00:21:07,000 --> 00:21:03,740 member who's been sexually abused by a 448 00:21:09,190 --> 00:21:07,010 Catholic priest you don't know how 449 00:21:11,380 --> 00:21:09,200 necessarily to express that or if you're 450 00:21:14,260 --> 00:21:11,390 gay or lesbian you told you know God 451 00:21:16,539 --> 00:21:14,270 hates or whatever the however 452 00:21:18,850 --> 00:21:16,549 you're told that message you know you 453 00:21:21,549 --> 00:21:18,860 have a deep pain there and then these 454 00:21:24,370 --> 00:21:21,559 guys come along and they say wow here's 455 00:21:25,180 --> 00:21:24,380 someone articulating what I what I feel 456 00:21:26,920 --> 00:21:25,190 but can't 457 00:21:30,070 --> 00:21:26,930 and they sound so smart I mean isn't 458 00:21:32,710 --> 00:21:30,080 that the the lure a lot of times for and 459 00:21:35,260 --> 00:21:32,720 I mean III I'm willing to give if we're 460 00:21:37,600 --> 00:21:35,270 just talking in general about people who 461 00:21:40,060 --> 00:21:37,610 reject faith or reject Christianity and 462 00:21:41,410 --> 00:21:40,070 I'm willing to give the more credit 463 00:21:47,340 --> 00:21:41,420 either than that it may not just be 464 00:21:50,310 --> 00:21:47,350 personal aggrieved personal grievances 465 00:21:53,160 --> 00:21:50,320 we we live in a reality in which 466 00:21:56,650 --> 00:21:53,170 children die of incurable diseases 467 00:21:58,390 --> 00:21:56,660 chance disaster destroys innocent people 468 00:22:03,330 --> 00:21:58,400 and innocent lives pain as ubiquitous 469 00:22:07,480 --> 00:22:03,340 death is inevitable so there are serious 470 00:22:09,910 --> 00:22:07,490 moral spiritual existential reasons to 471 00:22:11,920 --> 00:22:09,920 rebel against the frame of reality I'm 472 00:22:15,520 --> 00:22:11,930 no problem with that and if it's 473 00:22:20,260 --> 00:22:15,530 conducted in that register with that 474 00:22:20,500 --> 00:22:20,270 intonation a serious atheism is a is you 475 00:22:22,990 --> 00:22:20,510 know 476 00:22:24,970 --> 00:22:23,000 one of the great accomplishments of 19th 477 00:22:28,210 --> 00:22:24,980 and 20th century especially serious 478 00:22:31,780 --> 00:22:28,220 thought and I'm and I and I admire it I 479 00:22:34,840 --> 00:22:31,790 revere it the new atheist so I'm not 480 00:22:37,090 --> 00:22:34,850 willing to put in the company of a canoe 481 00:22:39,430 --> 00:22:37,100 or a Nietzsche 482 00:22:42,250 --> 00:22:39,440 or a seriously reflective atheist 483 00:22:45,700 --> 00:22:42,260 because of the what they have produced 484 00:22:48,760 --> 00:22:45,710 does not merit comparison with the works 485 00:22:50,800 --> 00:22:48,770 of those those thinkers and so I would 486 00:22:53,890 --> 00:22:50,810 want to make a distinction there but I 487 00:22:57,670 --> 00:22:53,900 have nothing against atheism as such it 488 00:23:00,190 --> 00:22:57,680 is specifically this sort of willfully 489 00:23:04,050 --> 00:23:00,200 historically ignorant inadvertently 490 00:23:08,530 --> 00:23:04,060 philosophically incompetent and and 491 00:23:10,810 --> 00:23:08,540 rhetorically vicious atheism that has 492 00:23:12,100 --> 00:23:10,820 seized you know popular attention 493 00:23:14,230 --> 00:23:12,110 although it seems to be a bit on the 494 00:23:17,500 --> 00:23:14,240 wane now an influence to be honest I 495 00:23:21,330 --> 00:23:17,510 mean 2006 was the annus mirabilis of the 496 00:23:24,490 --> 00:23:21,340 movement and and it did it was you know 497 00:23:30,040 --> 00:23:24,500 it enjoyed a certain buoyancy in the 498 00:23:32,200 --> 00:23:30,050 aftermath of 9/11 and so on but of late 499 00:23:34,000 --> 00:23:32,210 if for instance in England whenever I'm 500 00:23:38,470 --> 00:23:34,010 back in England I can't help but notice 501 00:23:41,409 --> 00:23:38,480 now Richard Dawkins has ceased to be you 502 00:23:45,100 --> 00:23:41,419 Ursula revered in media I mean now the 503 00:23:47,500 --> 00:23:45,110 BBC and in the newspapers I tend to 504 00:23:51,010 --> 00:23:47,510 treat him with somewhat more aloofness 505 00:23:54,070 --> 00:23:51,020 and sometimes ridicule and in part 506 00:23:56,530 --> 00:23:54,080 that's because his public % personality 507 00:23:57,940 --> 00:23:56,540 boarded merchants the less tolerant it 508 00:23:59,500 --> 00:23:57,950 seems and then of course 509 00:24:02,110 --> 00:23:59,510 apparently he discovered Twitter 510 00:24:04,090 --> 00:24:02,120 recently that was it stayed I don't know 511 00:24:06,010 --> 00:24:04,100 I don't follow social media very close 512 00:24:08,320 --> 00:24:06,020 social so anyway I'm sorry that was 513 00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:08,330 longer but I do want to make a serious 514 00:24:15,070 --> 00:24:11,210 moral and and intellectually coherent 515 00:24:17,650 --> 00:24:15,080 rejection of of the the tenets of faith 516 00:24:19,480 --> 00:24:17,660 of the possibility of a good God all 517 00:24:21,340 --> 00:24:19,490 that I've no I'm no issues with that 518 00:24:24,549 --> 00:24:21,350 whatsoever but I don't think in our 519 00:24:26,799 --> 00:24:24,559 present cultural moment that those are 520 00:24:29,530 --> 00:24:26,809 the people who are making the biggest 521 00:24:30,940 --> 00:24:29,540 splash well I would agree with you and 522 00:24:33,789 --> 00:24:30,950 that kind of leads into my third 523 00:24:36,370 --> 00:24:33,799 question that is this new atheist kind 524 00:24:41,080 --> 00:24:36,380 of flag-waving thing maybe has waned but 525 00:24:43,810 --> 00:24:41,090 hasn't it really real or been recast as 526 00:24:46,360 --> 00:24:43,820 this what I think is a phony culture war 527 00:24:49,570 --> 00:24:46,370 debate between science and religion that 528 00:24:52,630 --> 00:24:49,580 we keep being told is kind of central to 529 00:24:55,030 --> 00:24:52,640 our culture and what's going on and to 530 00:24:58,090 --> 00:24:55,040 me it's so and I think you point this 531 00:24:59,770 --> 00:24:58,100 out in a number of ways it's so funny 532 00:25:02,230 --> 00:24:59,780 because what's being passed off as 533 00:25:03,610 --> 00:25:02,240 science is again this awkward 534 00:25:05,289 --> 00:25:03,620 metaphysics that you're talking about 535 00:25:08,590 --> 00:25:05,299 that comes to the conclusion that life 536 00:25:10,840 --> 00:25:08,600 is meaningless and yeah a proposition 537 00:25:12,580 --> 00:25:10,850 that any kind of man on the street if 538 00:25:14,860 --> 00:25:12,590 you will would just laugh and someone's 539 00:25:16,960 --> 00:25:14,870 faced him I'm a biological robot my life 540 00:25:18,760 --> 00:25:16,970 is meaningless the love I share with my 541 00:25:21,060 --> 00:25:18,770 family and you know that doesn't mean 542 00:25:24,220 --> 00:25:21,070 anything ridiculous no it buys into that 543 00:25:26,080 --> 00:25:24,230 well you can convince people to buy into 544 00:25:27,850 --> 00:25:26,090 a great deal though I mean they're I 545 00:25:31,150 --> 00:25:27,860 will disagree with you in the sense that 546 00:25:32,950 --> 00:25:31,160 people can't live that way but the 547 00:25:35,950 --> 00:25:32,960 doubleness of consciousness is always 548 00:25:38,020 --> 00:25:35,960 possible it's amazing to me since the 549 00:25:40,330 --> 00:25:38,030 publication of The Selfish Gene for 550 00:25:42,520 --> 00:25:40,340 instance and I mean I answer your bigger 551 00:25:45,460 --> 00:25:42,530 question at a moment if I remember after 552 00:25:46,240 --> 00:25:45,470 I go on in Mormon law but uh The Selfish 553 00:25:48,909 --> 00:25:46,250 Gene 554 00:25:50,760 --> 00:25:48,919 was a bad book as a work of science 555 00:25:54,330 --> 00:25:50,770 right 556 00:25:56,280 --> 00:25:54,340 from its its its social provocations no 557 00:25:58,950 --> 00:25:56,290 one I mean even even at the time it 558 00:26:01,920 --> 00:25:58,960 appeared it was a sort of a debt issue I 559 00:26:04,680 --> 00:26:01,930 mean no one no serious molecular 560 00:26:07,260 --> 00:26:04,690 biologist thinks of the gene in terms of 561 00:26:10,200 --> 00:26:07,270 a master code that inexorably unfolds 562 00:26:12,660 --> 00:26:10,210 into three-dimensional structures and 563 00:26:14,280 --> 00:26:12,670 hence therefore the complete code of 564 00:26:18,290 --> 00:26:14,290 life and and at the same time in some 565 00:26:23,460 --> 00:26:18,300 mysterious sense the dynamism of of 566 00:26:26,010 --> 00:26:23,470 expression in biological even complex 567 00:26:29,240 --> 00:26:26,020 organic systems I mean if you look at 568 00:26:31,950 --> 00:26:29,250 the state of molecular biology now a 569 00:26:33,540 --> 00:26:31,960 whole variety of causalities are 570 00:26:35,520 --> 00:26:33,550 considered all the different ways in 571 00:26:38,520 --> 00:26:35,530 which gene expression is controlled the 572 00:26:40,380 --> 00:26:38,530 actual paucity to be honest of coding 573 00:26:42,360 --> 00:26:40,390 where you expected in the genomic 574 00:26:44,880 --> 00:26:42,370 sequence has been one of the surprises 575 00:26:46,800 --> 00:26:44,890 of the human genome C but the funny 576 00:26:49,130 --> 00:26:46,810 thing is is that was already pretty well 577 00:26:51,240 --> 00:26:49,140 known at the time that book appeared 578 00:26:53,280 --> 00:26:51,250 absolutely but that's the real that's 579 00:26:54,930 --> 00:26:53,290 the real schizophrenia that we live and 580 00:26:56,760 --> 00:26:54,940 that's the emperor has no clothes so 581 00:26:58,710 --> 00:26:56,770 right so you can read you can read 582 00:26:59,940 --> 00:26:58,720 Dawkins if you're a molecular biologist 583 00:27:02,250 --> 00:26:59,950 but you have to hold your mouth and 584 00:27:05,130 --> 00:27:02,260 chuckle I mean you can't do it out loud 585 00:27:08,370 --> 00:27:05,140 don't miss the the crucial point which 586 00:27:11,220 --> 00:27:08,380 is that the metaphor of genetic 587 00:27:13,050 --> 00:27:11,230 selfishness and the persistence of this 588 00:27:16,170 --> 00:27:13,060 if you think of this quasi nah see this 589 00:27:17,970 --> 00:27:16,180 is absolutely silly and and logically 590 00:27:20,790 --> 00:27:17,980 incoherent notion that the real reason 591 00:27:22,920 --> 00:27:20,800 what we do things is actually this thing 592 00:27:26,370 --> 00:27:22,930 this genetic selfishness which is 593 00:27:28,500 --> 00:27:26,380 already and and in apt metaphor how 594 00:27:30,510 --> 00:27:28,510 pervasive that's become we'll just see 595 00:27:31,860 --> 00:27:30,520 it on television ear the radio read it 596 00:27:34,260 --> 00:27:31,870 in the press the point where people 597 00:27:37,110 --> 00:27:34,270 repeat it is just a given as a sense oh 598 00:27:39,090 --> 00:27:37,120 it's not a scientific view it's true 599 00:27:41,790 --> 00:27:39,100 let's see David that's my point I think 600 00:27:45,240 --> 00:27:41,800 that is a constructed phony debate 601 00:27:47,670 --> 00:27:45,250 because you know that fits so well into 602 00:27:49,290 --> 00:27:47,680 our if you I hate the term secular 603 00:27:52,040 --> 00:27:49,300 culture but in terms of our 604 00:27:54,780 --> 00:27:52,050 consumeristic materialistic soul 605 00:27:56,610 --> 00:27:54,790 eliminated culture that we like to put 606 00:27:58,650 --> 00:27:56,620 that and then we'd like to put that up 607 00:28:00,480 --> 00:27:58,660 against oh because if you don't buy into 608 00:28:02,790 --> 00:28:00,490 that then you're going to be buy into 609 00:28:04,259 --> 00:28:02,800 this wacky religion over here that is 610 00:28:06,389 --> 00:28:04,269 going to make you 611 00:28:07,739 --> 00:28:06,399 there's blind obedience to this dogma 612 00:28:09,869 --> 00:28:07,749 and all the rest I think it's a 613 00:28:11,789 --> 00:28:09,879 constructed debate because it's the 614 00:28:14,070 --> 00:28:11,799 debate that allows our culture to move 615 00:28:17,009 --> 00:28:14,080 forward in the way that you know 616 00:28:21,029 --> 00:28:17,019 promotes this consumeristic society that 617 00:28:23,699 --> 00:28:21,039 we have again if you've read enough 618 00:28:23,969 --> 00:28:23,709 myself obviously you know I agree with 619 00:28:29,639 --> 00:28:23,979 that 620 00:28:31,919 --> 00:28:29,649 this notion of the great war between 621 00:28:35,099 --> 00:28:31,929 science and religion or reason and faith 622 00:28:36,959 --> 00:28:35,109 is something in a sense it's born in the 623 00:28:38,849 --> 00:28:36,969 18th century but really it's at the end 624 00:28:41,279 --> 00:28:38,859 of the 19th century and people like 625 00:28:44,129 --> 00:28:41,289 Andrew Dixon white writing fake 626 00:28:49,289 --> 00:28:44,139 histories of the history of the story of 627 00:28:51,799 --> 00:28:49,299 the West that created created it's so 628 00:28:55,560 --> 00:28:51,809 funny I mean can you imagine telling 629 00:29:01,199 --> 00:28:55,570 Evans shredding shredding or Neil's bar 630 00:29:03,569 --> 00:29:01,209 that their commitment to of the 631 00:29:07,339 --> 00:29:03,579 Copenhagen interpretation of quantum 632 00:29:12,749 --> 00:29:07,349 physics or so quantum indeterminacy 633 00:29:16,169 --> 00:29:12,759 somehow it was in odds with their their 634 00:29:18,089 --> 00:29:16,179 rather deep religious intuitions and 635 00:29:22,139 --> 00:29:18,099 beliefs of directions which they saw as 636 00:29:24,869 --> 00:29:22,149 being rationally inevitable in some 637 00:29:26,819 --> 00:29:24,879 sense things they discover no I mean 638 00:29:28,619 --> 00:29:26,829 obviously it's it's a fake dichotomy you 639 00:29:30,569 --> 00:29:28,629 find it more in biology than anywhere 640 00:29:33,019 --> 00:29:30,579 else curiously enough in the realm of 641 00:29:35,430 --> 00:29:33,029 physics even the people who run 642 00:29:38,459 --> 00:29:35,440 associated academic associations of 643 00:29:41,099 --> 00:29:38,469 physics may may be quite often 644 00:29:44,369 --> 00:29:41,109 unthinking materialists as a rule among 645 00:29:49,829 --> 00:29:44,379 physicists and mathematicians and people 646 00:29:52,680 --> 00:29:49,839 outside biology the the percentage of 647 00:29:56,940 --> 00:29:52,690 those who consider themselves strict 648 00:29:59,849 --> 00:29:56,950 materialists isn't conspicuously larger 649 00:30:02,119 --> 00:29:59,859 than in the educated class at large in 650 00:30:04,979 --> 00:30:02,129 in America so you know it's not really 651 00:30:07,909 --> 00:30:04,989 but in look in biology there there's an 652 00:30:11,159 --> 00:30:07,919 ideological war still being fought and 653 00:30:13,379 --> 00:30:11,169 neo-darwinian isn't being via the model 654 00:30:14,250 --> 00:30:13,389 of biology that is triumphant at the 655 00:30:18,000 --> 00:30:14,260 moment and 656 00:30:25,380 --> 00:30:18,010 that you know decades ago displaced 657 00:30:28,710 --> 00:30:25,390 other understandings more you know other 658 00:30:31,110 --> 00:30:28,720 ways of approaching biology the sort of 659 00:30:33,510 --> 00:30:31,120 the classical Victorian semi 660 00:30:36,360 --> 00:30:33,520 Aristotelian approach to complex 661 00:30:39,060 --> 00:30:36,370 organisms has been displaced by a 662 00:30:41,730 --> 00:30:39,070 specific kind of neo-darwinian Ginetta 663 00:30:43,860 --> 00:30:41,740 centric biology and there there is a 664 00:30:47,070 --> 00:30:43,870 there is a working metaphysics that's 665 00:30:48,900 --> 00:30:47,080 not just tacit but that is part of the 666 00:30:51,930 --> 00:30:48,910 whole project I mean it is the 667 00:30:53,880 --> 00:30:51,940 mechanization of nature and and that's 668 00:30:57,270 --> 00:30:53,890 where you really find this mythology 669 00:30:59,640 --> 00:30:57,280 promoted with the most vigor let's talk 670 00:31:02,940 --> 00:30:59,650 about something more important let's 671 00:31:04,410 --> 00:31:02,950 talk about transcendence one of the 672 00:31:07,200 --> 00:31:04,420 things I really like about your book the 673 00:31:10,500 --> 00:31:07,210 experience of God being consciousness 674 00:31:12,750 --> 00:31:10,510 bliss is that as with all your writing 675 00:31:15,360 --> 00:31:12,760 it's it's poetic and at the same time 676 00:31:18,810 --> 00:31:15,370 it's intellectually rigorous and I think 677 00:31:21,150 --> 00:31:18,820 that in and of itself embodies this 678 00:31:23,970 --> 00:31:21,160 coming together of the head and the 679 00:31:26,910 --> 00:31:23,980 heart that I think is central to what 680 00:31:29,730 --> 00:31:26,920 you're trying to bring to us in terms of 681 00:31:32,070 --> 00:31:29,740 how we can understand spiritually 682 00:31:35,370 --> 00:31:32,080 transformative experiences and this 683 00:31:37,860 --> 00:31:35,380 awakening that I think I observe seems 684 00:31:40,080 --> 00:31:37,870 to be happening to a larger and larger 685 00:31:41,820 --> 00:31:40,090 number of people you know one of those 686 00:31:43,230 --> 00:31:41,830 shows out there that I really like and 687 00:31:48,750 --> 00:31:43,240 this guy's been on my show several times 688 00:31:54,570 --> 00:31:51,840 so each week Rick Archer interviews 689 00:31:57,150 --> 00:31:54,580 folks who seem to be going through these 690 00:31:58,800 --> 00:31:57,160 profound spiritual awakenings as 691 00:32:01,740 --> 00:31:58,810 transcendence and sometimes it's you 692 00:32:04,110 --> 00:32:01,750 know it's a very prominently guys been 693 00:32:06,480 --> 00:32:04,120 on several times a Christian monk living 694 00:32:09,720 --> 00:32:06,490 in a monastery for 15 years he's praying 695 00:32:11,760 --> 00:32:09,730 and boom he has what the Hindus would 696 00:32:13,290 --> 00:32:11,770 call a Kundalini experience but 697 00:32:15,660 --> 00:32:13,300 sometimes it's ordinary people who have 698 00:32:18,090 --> 00:32:15,670 had a near-death it probably more like a 699 00:32:20,220 --> 00:32:18,100 Toria experienced but I'm just guessing 700 00:32:22,590 --> 00:32:20,230 anyway go on as I've heard and as is 701 00:32:25,740 --> 00:32:22,600 reflected in the very title of this book 702 00:32:27,810 --> 00:32:25,750 being consciousness bliss but but you 703 00:32:29,640 --> 00:32:27,820 can you can may be exhausting 704 00:32:32,880 --> 00:32:29,650 speed entry there for no good reason so 705 00:32:35,880 --> 00:32:32,890 just go the point is or the question is 706 00:32:39,320 --> 00:32:35,890 you know what's going on here what is 707 00:32:41,490 --> 00:32:39,330 happening with this deep transformative 708 00:32:44,520 --> 00:32:41,500 experience of God to borrow the title 709 00:32:46,530 --> 00:32:44,530 from your book is is there something at 710 00:32:49,770 --> 00:32:46,540 play is there something in the air 711 00:32:52,170 --> 00:32:49,780 that's causing more people to achieve 712 00:32:54,030 --> 00:32:52,180 this state that we you know when I was a 713 00:32:57,150 --> 00:32:54,040 kid I mean this was the kind of thing 714 00:32:59,940 --> 00:32:57,160 you thought a few Saints and mystics 715 00:33:01,830 --> 00:32:59,950 maybe achieved you know a couple times 716 00:33:03,360 --> 00:33:01,840 on the planet but now it seems to be 717 00:33:05,220 --> 00:33:03,370 happening more regularly do you see that 718 00:33:07,200 --> 00:33:05,230 do you believe that or are you inclined 719 00:33:08,640 --> 00:33:07,210 to think of it maybe that's kind of 720 00:33:11,520 --> 00:33:08,650 internet hype I don't know 721 00:33:14,610 --> 00:33:11,530 yeah I'm unaware of it if it's true to 722 00:33:16,590 --> 00:33:14,620 be honest but it doesn't it wouldn't 723 00:33:19,880 --> 00:33:16,600 surprise me one way or the other but my 724 00:33:22,290 --> 00:33:19,890 real my claim my answer to that would be 725 00:33:26,880 --> 00:33:22,300 that it's always been more common than 726 00:33:31,500 --> 00:33:26,890 we imagined and I don't as a rule even 727 00:33:34,790 --> 00:33:31,510 though my interest in in mysticism or 728 00:33:37,860 --> 00:33:34,800 all the great traditions goes very deep 729 00:33:39,510 --> 00:33:37,870 when I write about consciousness I I 730 00:33:41,700 --> 00:33:39,520 write about the experience of the 731 00:33:43,650 --> 00:33:41,710 transcendent right within the midst of 732 00:33:47,220 --> 00:33:43,660 the ordinary that every ordinary act of 733 00:33:49,710 --> 00:33:47,230 consciousness is already saturated with 734 00:33:51,840 --> 00:33:49,720 with a with a sort of primordial 735 00:33:54,660 --> 00:33:51,850 knowledge of transcendence so if there 736 00:33:55,920 --> 00:33:54,670 is I don't know I mean it's something 737 00:34:00,060 --> 00:33:55,930 that I think it would be talked about 738 00:34:06,900 --> 00:34:00,070 more the more oppressively mechanistic 739 00:34:10,110 --> 00:34:06,910 the the tacit orthodoxy becomes the more 740 00:34:13,320 --> 00:34:10,120 striking and in some sense urgent the 741 00:34:15,810 --> 00:34:13,330 expressions of experiences that don't 742 00:34:17,880 --> 00:34:15,820 fit into that picture are likely to be 743 00:34:20,220 --> 00:34:17,890 whether it's actually happening more 744 00:34:22,170 --> 00:34:20,230 frequently at this moment then and up at 745 00:34:24,570 --> 00:34:22,180 other times I I don't know I mean really 746 00:34:26,370 --> 00:34:24,580 I don't know how to quantify it and 747 00:34:29,940 --> 00:34:26,380 you're actually erasing a question 748 00:34:33,650 --> 00:34:29,950 that's new to me I I'm not aware of that 749 00:34:37,890 --> 00:34:33,660 but it wouldn't surprise me 750 00:34:41,100 --> 00:34:37,900 mostly because I think that what we tend 751 00:34:44,100 --> 00:34:41,110 to think of as an unusual 752 00:34:47,250 --> 00:34:44,110 a mystical experience is in many ways 753 00:34:49,520 --> 00:34:47,260 the intensification of something that's 754 00:34:53,010 --> 00:34:49,530 already present to us in our ordinary 755 00:34:55,500 --> 00:34:53,020 experience when we attend to it right 756 00:34:57,270 --> 00:34:55,510 and all the great spiritual traditions I 757 00:34:58,980 --> 00:34:57,280 mean you mentioned I don't know what 758 00:35:01,080 --> 00:34:58,990 Buddha at the gas pump means really but 759 00:35:03,450 --> 00:35:01,090 I mean you know there is you know how 760 00:35:05,490 --> 00:35:03,460 many of these traditions were there you 761 00:35:07,710 --> 00:35:05,500 know the Christian writings of Evagrius 762 00:35:12,660 --> 00:35:07,720 potica stand and Maximus the Confessor 763 00:35:15,420 --> 00:35:12,670 or yogacara chedda mantra texts and 764 00:35:18,360 --> 00:35:15,430 Buddhism or a burrito or hashish and 765 00:35:20,730 --> 00:35:18,370 fy'y to fatten to text the attention to 766 00:35:24,900 --> 00:35:20,740 ordinary states of consciousness that 767 00:35:29,010 --> 00:35:24,910 discovers already the degree to which 768 00:35:31,860 --> 00:35:29,020 they at the very ground of human 769 00:35:35,700 --> 00:35:31,870 awareness is is what is irreducibly 770 00:35:37,020 --> 00:35:35,710 transcendent of finite causes right the 771 00:35:39,780 --> 00:35:37,030 buddha ting didn't go through and 772 00:35:41,970 --> 00:35:39,790 awakening the buddha realized he was 773 00:35:44,010 --> 00:35:41,980 already in that state right isn't that 774 00:35:46,080 --> 00:35:44,020 the the essence of the Buddhist teaching 775 00:35:49,140 --> 00:35:46,090 is that well it depends on which school 776 00:35:50,100 --> 00:35:49,150 you're talking right for you know I mean 777 00:35:52,080 --> 00:35:50,110 there there's some very radical 778 00:35:54,750 --> 00:35:52,090 statements like that and saying Hong 779 00:35:56,880 --> 00:35:54,760 Kong Khushi so Buddhism in Japan others 780 00:35:59,970 --> 00:35:56,890 it depends I mean let me just say there 781 00:36:03,150 --> 00:35:59,980 Buddhism is as every bit as various and 782 00:36:06,300 --> 00:36:03,160 in its expressions as Christianity or 783 00:36:11,370 --> 00:36:06,310 any other long tradition we thought with 784 00:36:14,010 --> 00:36:11,380 a large speculative history but yes I 785 00:36:15,720 --> 00:36:14,020 mean it's it's not an awakening in the 786 00:36:18,090 --> 00:36:15,730 say it's not it's not as if he was 787 00:36:21,480 --> 00:36:18,100 transformed into something else it's 788 00:36:27,390 --> 00:36:21,490 that he touched the ground of the 789 00:36:30,450 --> 00:36:27,400 reality that was always there and you 790 00:36:31,890 --> 00:36:30,460 know my conviction and the way I 791 00:36:34,670 --> 00:36:31,900 approach these things because of course 792 00:36:37,250 --> 00:36:34,680 I'm also working within a 793 00:36:40,800 --> 00:36:37,260 phenomenological tradition in philosophy 794 00:36:42,510 --> 00:36:40,810 is that if you examine the act of 795 00:36:47,550 --> 00:36:42,520 consciousness in which you are engaged 796 00:36:50,359 --> 00:36:47,560 when you're you know choosing a tie you 797 00:36:53,670 --> 00:36:50,369 already find 798 00:36:56,240 --> 00:36:53,680 dynamism that exceed the possibilities 799 00:36:59,549 --> 00:36:56,250 of the naturalist picture of reality 800 00:37:02,309 --> 00:36:59,559 okay last question and has to do with 801 00:37:04,079 --> 00:37:02,319 the future of Christianity in your book 802 00:37:05,460 --> 00:37:04,089 atheist delusions which again you didn't 803 00:37:07,079 --> 00:37:05,470 pick that part of the title you pick the 804 00:37:07,589 --> 00:37:07,089 subtitle but I think you got to live 805 00:37:09,529 --> 00:37:07,599 with it 806 00:37:11,640 --> 00:37:09,539 alright hey I think it's sold some books 807 00:37:13,950 --> 00:37:11,650 yeah they know what they're doing in 808 00:37:16,140 --> 00:37:13,960 that regard don't they and also in this 809 00:37:17,640 --> 00:37:16,150 in this latest book experience of God 810 00:37:21,380 --> 00:37:17,650 you know you do 811 00:37:24,809 --> 00:37:21,390 really a masterful job of reclaiming 812 00:37:28,049 --> 00:37:24,819 Christian history from the sloppy 813 00:37:30,749 --> 00:37:28,059 rewriting it's gotten from atheistic 814 00:37:32,069 --> 00:37:30,759 academia over the years but here's the 815 00:37:34,710 --> 00:37:32,079 hard question you know what are we 816 00:37:37,799 --> 00:37:34,720 really trying to preserve and protect I 817 00:37:39,870 --> 00:37:37,809 mean you're an inspiring guy I can grab 818 00:37:42,210 --> 00:37:39,880 a couple yearbooks maybe a couple others 819 00:37:44,309 --> 00:37:42,220 get a group of friends together and I'm 820 00:37:46,859 --> 00:37:44,319 good right I mean unless there's a 821 00:37:49,200 --> 00:37:46,869 funeral or her wedding going on down at 822 00:37:51,839 --> 00:37:49,210 the church what do I need to go down 823 00:37:54,109 --> 00:37:51,849 there for I mean well the counter 824 00:37:56,549 --> 00:37:54,119 hypothesis I think to Christian 825 00:37:58,920 --> 00:37:56,559 Christianity is one that I think you're 826 00:38:02,249 --> 00:37:58,930 talking all about and that's that gnosis 827 00:38:03,059 --> 00:38:02,259 shows up you know if I'm there if I'm 828 00:38:06,799 --> 00:38:03,069 open 829 00:38:09,690 --> 00:38:06,809 gnosis shows up why do I need this 830 00:38:13,200 --> 00:38:09,700 institution for well of course that 831 00:38:14,549 --> 00:38:13,210 question is going to we have different 832 00:38:16,769 --> 00:38:14,559 inflections according to which 833 00:38:20,009 --> 00:38:16,779 institution in which experience you have 834 00:38:24,240 --> 00:38:20,019 it you take it were raised Greek 835 00:38:28,859 --> 00:38:24,250 Orthodox right yes I was yes well I am 836 00:38:30,450 --> 00:38:28,869 Eastern Orthodox myself so it but that I 837 00:38:36,210 --> 00:38:30,460 wasn't raised though it was raised high 838 00:38:39,990 --> 00:38:36,220 Anglican yeah I mean if gnosis is what 839 00:38:42,870 --> 00:38:40,000 you're after it's it's it's true that 840 00:38:46,650 --> 00:38:42,880 you're not constrained to finding it 841 00:38:48,839 --> 00:38:46,660 only and in fact if you're subjected to 842 00:38:51,329 --> 00:38:48,849 a certain kind of sermon which is which 843 00:38:54,990 --> 00:38:51,339 is all too common you're likely to find 844 00:38:58,140 --> 00:38:55,000 it an impediment that's it but the 845 00:39:01,140 --> 00:38:58,150 spiritual life is a spiritual life of 846 00:39:02,859 --> 00:39:01,150 community for one thing within Christian 847 00:39:07,599 --> 00:39:02,869 thoughts specifically 848 00:39:11,319 --> 00:39:07,609 it is it is to be become part of a body 849 00:39:14,259 --> 00:39:11,329 of love and knowledge if you know in 850 00:39:16,689 --> 00:39:14,269 your this this is an old question after 851 00:39:21,729 --> 00:39:16,699 all in every tradition you don't have to 852 00:39:25,779 --> 00:39:21,739 just address Christianity one of the 853 00:39:28,449 --> 00:39:25,789 great differences between the Mahayana 854 00:39:30,429 --> 00:39:28,459 tradition and Buddhism and traditions I 855 00:39:32,259 --> 00:39:30,439 should say and what they call Hinayana 856 00:39:34,359 --> 00:39:32,269 unless serve it well let's do it's just 857 00:39:37,329 --> 00:39:34,369 to call it a be Dharma Buddhism say yes 858 00:39:40,449 --> 00:39:37,339 is this great assault on the ethos of 859 00:39:43,179 --> 00:39:40,459 the practica Buddha who strives only for 860 00:39:46,269 --> 00:39:43,189 his own lighten meant and and it's not 861 00:39:49,539 --> 00:39:46,279 moved by the greater compassion the maha 862 00:39:52,599 --> 00:39:49,549 Karuna that's described by say something 863 00:39:54,759 --> 00:39:52,609 like shanti devi in and when you dwell 864 00:39:57,789 --> 00:39:54,769 in that compassion the compassion of the 865 00:40:01,509 --> 00:39:57,799 bodhisattva who for goes as an entrance 866 00:40:04,120 --> 00:40:01,519 into nirvana in order to strive for the 867 00:40:07,089 --> 00:40:04,130 salvation of all you find that that 868 00:40:08,949 --> 00:40:07,099 compassion that love itself is the 869 00:40:11,709 --> 00:40:08,959 enlightenment to which every other 870 00:40:15,279 --> 00:40:11,719 enlightenment is only a foreshadowing 871 00:40:19,059 --> 00:40:15,289 and and so the body salford discovers 872 00:40:21,219 --> 00:40:19,069 that in samsara and Nirvana or one well 873 00:40:24,429 --> 00:40:21,229 in Christian thought you know especially 874 00:40:28,809 --> 00:40:24,439 this this is this is you know the body 875 00:40:30,849 --> 00:40:28,819 of love of the God who pours himself out 876 00:40:32,949 --> 00:40:30,859 into nothingness you know the great 877 00:40:38,199 --> 00:40:32,959 Philippians him in order to unite 878 00:40:43,390 --> 00:40:38,209 creatures to himself is is a experience 879 00:40:45,279 --> 00:40:43,400 that is as much charity as gnosis you 880 00:40:48,759 --> 00:40:45,289 talked about uniting head and heart well 881 00:40:50,769 --> 00:40:48,769 the heart doesn't really do well in its 882 00:40:54,669 --> 00:40:50,779 you know in its own living room by 883 00:40:57,519 --> 00:40:54,679 itself but what do you need it for 884 00:40:59,589 --> 00:40:57,529 well I mean again if you if we get into 885 00:41:03,999 --> 00:40:59,599 doctrinal issues that becomes a boring 886 00:41:06,729 --> 00:41:04,009 conversation but if if you do I believe 887 00:41:13,120 --> 00:41:06,739 that gnosis is enough if gnosis doesn't 888 00:41:16,100 --> 00:41:13,130 mean life in continuity with a community 889 00:41:19,340 --> 00:41:16,110 devoted to the same trends 890 00:41:21,080 --> 00:41:19,350 horizon of love and knowledge no I'd say 891 00:41:25,520 --> 00:41:21,090 that's not I mean that's not a real 892 00:41:26,990 --> 00:41:25,530 awakening yet that's no that's a kind of 893 00:41:29,450 --> 00:41:27,000 enlightenment but it's not yet a 894 00:41:30,770 --> 00:41:29,460 transformation of the self right but as 895 00:41:35,660 --> 00:41:30,780 you alluded to I mean I think that 896 00:41:38,480 --> 00:41:35,670 gnosis leads to no matter no matter what 897 00:41:40,790 --> 00:41:38,490 the on-ramp we take we're gonna be on 898 00:41:42,470 --> 00:41:40,800 that highway of love and compassion 899 00:41:44,630 --> 00:41:42,480 because there's only one you know 900 00:41:47,330 --> 00:41:44,640 there's only one highway together I mean 901 00:41:51,140 --> 00:41:47,340 occasionally I have discovered destroy 902 00:41:52,790 --> 00:41:51,150 you know sometimes for instance I've 903 00:41:55,000 --> 00:41:52,800 talked to people who considered 904 00:41:57,500 --> 00:41:55,010 themselves perennial lists and 905 00:42:00,410 --> 00:41:57,510 specifically within what they understand 906 00:42:03,620 --> 00:42:00,420 to be the Advaita Vedanta tradition has 907 00:42:05,630 --> 00:42:03,630 translated 3xu on and on who seem to 908 00:42:08,240 --> 00:42:05,640 miss this out I mean they give mouth 909 00:42:11,780 --> 00:42:08,250 service to people like Ramakrishna who 910 00:42:15,200 --> 00:42:11,790 believed deeply in charity and love 911 00:42:18,500 --> 00:42:15,210 towards all but but who talk sometimes 912 00:42:19,580 --> 00:42:18,510 in a depressingly almost a go vistacal 913 00:42:23,690 --> 00:42:19,590 way even though they think they've 914 00:42:26,630 --> 00:42:23,700 transcended ego so about you know those 915 00:42:28,340 --> 00:42:26,640 who are not enlightened you know just a 916 00:42:30,710 --> 00:42:28,350 very dismissive and if they don't speak 917 00:42:32,990 --> 00:42:30,720 of their own enlightenment as something 918 00:42:35,630 --> 00:42:33,000 so interior that it doesn't have a 919 00:42:37,310 --> 00:42:35,640 communal dimension it can happen I can 920 00:42:40,940 --> 00:42:37,320 happen in any tradition I'm just picking 921 00:42:42,980 --> 00:42:40,950 them out because that's because that's 922 00:42:45,890 --> 00:42:42,990 just one school of thought that puts 923 00:42:50,440 --> 00:42:45,900 such an emphasis on gnosis that is often 924 00:42:53,540 --> 00:42:50,450 forgets that gnosis is also a gothy or 925 00:42:56,240 --> 00:42:53,550 charity David what are you working on 926 00:42:58,520 --> 00:42:56,250 now and and how can folks stay in 927 00:43:02,870 --> 00:42:58,530 contact with your work on an ongoing 928 00:43:04,730 --> 00:43:02,880 basis well the project I'm involved in 929 00:43:06,860 --> 00:43:04,740 at the moment I call it a project 930 00:43:09,410 --> 00:43:06,870 because it's endowed for this year at 931 00:43:12,700 --> 00:43:09,420 Notre Dame the book out writing is a 932 00:43:19,160 --> 00:43:12,710 deeper exploration of consciousness that 933 00:43:20,990 --> 00:43:19,170 in a more deliberate and maybe in a more 934 00:43:24,200 --> 00:43:21,000 ambitious way deals with the themes that 935 00:43:26,120 --> 00:43:24,210 are raised in the course of the argument 936 00:43:28,470 --> 00:43:26,130 in the fourth chapter of my last book 937 00:43:32,550 --> 00:43:28,480 and it's 938 00:43:36,510 --> 00:43:32,560 uh you know it's it's it starts with 939 00:43:39,150 --> 00:43:36,520 again a philosophical examination of 940 00:43:41,070 --> 00:43:39,160 natural ins and the naturalist models of 941 00:43:44,520 --> 00:43:41,080 consciousness but it moves an extra way 942 00:43:47,570 --> 00:43:44,530 towards a metaphysical series a 943 00:43:51,210 --> 00:43:47,580 metaphysical and religious claims it's 944 00:43:52,950 --> 00:43:51,220 it's a large project it's on the salt 945 00:43:55,560 --> 00:43:52,960 let's put it that way on consciousness 946 00:43:58,770 --> 00:43:55,570 and the soul great and how do you try 947 00:44:00,540 --> 00:43:58,780 and incorporate any science in their 948 00:44:02,790 --> 00:44:00,550 consciousness science that's leading us 949 00:44:04,859 --> 00:44:02,800 towards a deeper realization of this 950 00:44:06,960 --> 00:44:04,869 extended consciousness we spend a lot of 951 00:44:09,390 --> 00:44:06,970 time on this show looking at the science 952 00:44:11,190 --> 00:44:09,400 of near-death experience the science of 953 00:44:13,650 --> 00:44:11,200 extended consciousness all over the 954 00:44:16,620 --> 00:44:13,660 place because I think it both completely 955 00:44:19,770 --> 00:44:16,630 falsifies this materialism that we're 956 00:44:22,290 --> 00:44:19,780 talking about and I think it's that gets 957 00:44:24,750 --> 00:44:22,300 us to the entry point or the the gateway 958 00:44:28,170 --> 00:44:24,760 of trying to being able to really 959 00:44:30,030 --> 00:44:28,180 consider seriously some of that stuff so 960 00:44:33,690 --> 00:44:30,040 do you delve into the science of it or 961 00:44:35,460 --> 00:44:33,700 not so much or not so much depends what 962 00:44:37,080 --> 00:44:35,470 you mean by the sign sometimes for 963 00:44:40,020 --> 00:44:37,090 example near-death experience I think 964 00:44:42,150 --> 00:44:40,030 directly though in fact I may disappoint 965 00:44:46,470 --> 00:44:42,160 you but I go out of my way to avoid that 966 00:44:48,030 --> 00:44:46,480 because I once again you know of course 967 00:44:50,580 --> 00:44:48,040 it was never an issue with me since I 968 00:44:52,170 --> 00:44:50,590 don't believe in the mechanistic picture 969 00:44:54,690 --> 00:44:52,180 of the soul so near-death experience has 970 00:44:56,670 --> 00:44:54,700 just seemed you know not surprising to 971 00:44:59,160 --> 00:44:56,680 me although the accounts you read of 972 00:45:02,010 --> 00:44:59,170 them can be disappointing every but 973 00:45:05,310 --> 00:45:02,020 right and I've had encounters with 974 00:45:07,680 --> 00:45:05,320 booths grace and I was at UVA you know 975 00:45:09,660 --> 00:45:07,690 so I did my doctorate and I taught there 976 00:45:12,359 --> 00:45:09,670 for a while and I corresponded with them 977 00:45:18,150 --> 00:45:12,369 briefly but that's actually I mean again 978 00:45:20,250 --> 00:45:18,160 I'm what fascinates me or not the way in 979 00:45:22,530 --> 00:45:20,260 which extraordinary experiences which 980 00:45:24,359 --> 00:45:22,540 may be contentious and contended you 981 00:45:26,070 --> 00:45:24,369 cannot I mean you're not going to be 982 00:45:29,190 --> 00:45:26,080 able to hammer that home with great 983 00:45:32,460 --> 00:45:29,200 success to convinced materialists no 984 00:45:36,480 --> 00:45:32,470 matter how much evidence you think you 985 00:45:38,099 --> 00:45:36,490 amass there he's going to deny it he's 986 00:45:41,410 --> 00:45:38,109 going to dismiss a great deal of it in 987 00:45:44,620 --> 00:45:41,420 sanik doable or due to a fairly you know 988 00:45:47,200 --> 00:45:44,630 the limits of our ability to measure 989 00:45:49,450 --> 00:45:47,210 deep electrical processes in the 990 00:45:52,660 --> 00:45:49,460 cerebral cortex and all the while that's 991 00:45:55,090 --> 00:45:52,670 going on he's going to be missing such 992 00:45:57,820 --> 00:45:55,100 fundamental issues that again as I say 993 00:45:59,890 --> 00:45:57,830 too would be available to him or her I 994 00:46:04,150 --> 00:45:59,900 guess I Patricia Churchland I must leave 995 00:46:06,030 --> 00:46:04,160 out of this or anyone like that just 996 00:46:08,620 --> 00:46:06,040 from ordinary from the ordinary 997 00:46:11,260 --> 00:46:08,630 phenomenology of consciousness and every 998 00:46:13,810 --> 00:46:11,270 moment of life however however ordinary 999 00:46:15,730 --> 00:46:13,820 the acts of consciousness see that 1000 00:46:19,810 --> 00:46:15,740 remains fascinating assuming because 1001 00:46:22,060 --> 00:46:19,820 once if you can get someone to see but 1002 00:46:24,540 --> 00:46:22,070 there's a fundamental irreducibility of 1003 00:46:28,290 --> 00:46:24,550 these of the structure of consciousness 1004 00:46:31,690 --> 00:46:28,300 to mechanistic materialism then the rest 1005 00:46:34,570 --> 00:46:31,700 becomes plausible follows it opens the 1006 00:46:37,720 --> 00:46:34,580 mind but if you can't if you cannot if 1007 00:46:40,840 --> 00:46:37,730 you can't get this through then no 1008 00:46:42,820 --> 00:46:40,850 amount of merely quantitative evidence 1009 00:46:44,620 --> 00:46:42,830 of other people's experiences that you 1010 00:46:47,470 --> 00:46:44,630 present them with will convince them of 1011 00:46:49,510 --> 00:46:47,480 atoms they kind of agree with you I do 1012 00:46:52,420 --> 00:46:49,520 think there's a path in there that that 1013 00:46:53,950 --> 00:46:52,430 I feel comfortable with and that is the 1014 00:46:56,730 --> 00:46:53,960 science if you will of near-death 1015 00:47:00,040 --> 00:46:56,740 experience and it is a science we have 1016 00:47:03,520 --> 00:47:00,050 100 or 200 peer-reviewed papers on that 1017 00:47:06,330 --> 00:47:03,530 and we have science of of after death 1018 00:47:10,110 --> 00:47:06,340 communication all over the place but I 1019 00:47:13,960 --> 00:47:10,120 think if we focus on that as a 1020 00:47:16,810 --> 00:47:13,970 falsification of materialism I think 1021 00:47:19,270 --> 00:47:16,820 what it really brings forward is the 1022 00:47:22,210 --> 00:47:19,280 metaphysics of materialism right because 1023 00:47:24,220 --> 00:47:22,220 if it's if it's argued correctly it says 1024 00:47:26,170 --> 00:47:24,230 okay what's really at stake here guys 1025 00:47:28,570 --> 00:47:26,180 we're calling into question if you will 1026 00:47:30,910 --> 00:47:28,580 materialism and in the process let's 1027 00:47:31,990 --> 00:47:30,920 re-examine what they're really trying to 1028 00:47:34,660 --> 00:47:32,000 sell you here folks 1029 00:47:36,190 --> 00:47:34,670 because you are not a biological robot 1030 00:47:37,900 --> 00:47:36,200 in a meaningless universe and you never 1031 00:47:39,670 --> 00:47:37,910 thought you were but you kind of went 1032 00:47:42,790 --> 00:47:39,680 along with it so I think when your 1033 00:47:45,640 --> 00:47:42,800 confidence in materialism wanes a little 1034 00:47:47,740 --> 00:47:45,650 bit I think that's an opening for what 1035 00:47:51,010 --> 00:47:47,750 you're talking about no you may be right 1036 00:47:53,350 --> 00:47:51,020 but again I mean let me put it this way 1037 00:47:54,710 --> 00:47:53,360 there's a certain sort of psychology 1038 00:47:57,620 --> 00:47:54,720 involved here 1039 00:47:59,839 --> 00:47:57,630 that can erect defenses against them but 1040 00:48:02,780 --> 00:47:59,849 let's let's hath ology I think you call 1041 00:48:05,089 --> 00:48:02,790 it quite correctly well sure but yes so 1042 00:48:09,349 --> 00:48:05,099 yeah if you can amass if you can 1043 00:48:10,820 --> 00:48:09,359 accumulate sufficient evidence you know 1044 00:48:13,430 --> 00:48:10,830 that this should call into question 1045 00:48:16,210 --> 00:48:13,440 these easy and materialist assumptions 1046 00:48:19,820 --> 00:48:16,220 yeah sure that has a clarifying effect 1047 00:48:22,280 --> 00:48:19,830 still again my interests are in in the 1048 00:48:25,640 --> 00:48:22,290 whole how can I put a set of logical 1049 00:48:29,030 --> 00:48:25,650 assumptions underlying naturalism they 1050 00:48:31,220 --> 00:48:29,040 don't accord with any experience at all 1051 00:48:33,140 --> 00:48:31,230 not just extraordinary experiences and 1052 00:48:35,000 --> 00:48:33,150 they'd perfect you know good any 1053 00:48:37,310 --> 00:48:35,010 experience in all sitting the person 1054 00:48:40,310 --> 00:48:37,320 reading it may never have heard of an 1055 00:48:42,050 --> 00:48:40,320 ende may never have had an intuition of 1056 00:48:43,640 --> 00:48:42,060 something happening at a distance or 1057 00:48:44,690 --> 00:48:43,650 something dreamt something before it 1058 00:48:47,089 --> 00:48:44,700 happened I mean these are all common 1059 00:48:48,950 --> 00:48:47,099 experiences and they're attested to but 1060 00:48:51,320 --> 00:48:48,960 they're tested to from the first person 1061 00:48:53,839 --> 00:48:51,330 stance but if the person who has no 1062 00:48:58,000 --> 00:48:53,849 experience of this sitting alone in a 1063 00:49:01,700 --> 00:48:58,010 room reading an argument can from that 1064 00:49:03,950 --> 00:49:01,710 examine his or her own states of 1065 00:49:07,790 --> 00:49:03,960 consciousness and recognize the problem 1066 00:49:10,460 --> 00:49:07,800 then it's much harder simply to ignore 1067 00:49:13,940 --> 00:49:10,470 what becomes you know insistently 1068 00:49:15,890 --> 00:49:13,950 obvious day to day that is my interest I 1069 00:49:17,780 --> 00:49:15,900 mean it is I you know I am interested in 1070 00:49:20,030 --> 00:49:17,790 that's great sort of immigrant sighted 1071 00:49:22,640 --> 00:49:20,040 in a philosophical account the structure 1072 00:49:25,790 --> 00:49:22,650 of consciousness in the way that it not 1073 00:49:28,370 --> 00:49:25,800 only leaves us without a naturalistic 1074 00:49:30,650 --> 00:49:28,380 Amitha self but it actually moves 1075 00:49:34,780 --> 00:49:30,660 towards statements about the 1076 00:49:38,089 --> 00:49:34,790 transcendent reality of consciousness 1077 00:49:40,760 --> 00:49:38,099 what's the best way for people to follow 1078 00:49:42,320 --> 00:49:40,770 what you're doing well christmas is 1079 00:49:45,970 --> 00:49:42,330 coming up I got lots of books out there 1080 00:49:50,859 --> 00:49:45,980 on the market and I I just I don't know 1081 00:49:53,930 --> 00:49:50,869 III and person who prefers to publish I 1082 00:49:55,730 --> 00:49:53,940 don't and for health reasons of late 1083 00:49:58,030 --> 00:49:55,740 anyway I don't do as much public 1084 00:50:02,480 --> 00:49:58,040 speaking but but I keep up a fairly 1085 00:50:04,609 --> 00:50:02,490 continuous flow of publication you know 1086 00:50:08,089 --> 00:50:04,619 you're I say that and we will have links 1087 00:50:08,810 --> 00:50:08,099 folks in the show notes you you do write 1088 00:50:11,210 --> 00:50:08,820 frequent 1089 00:50:12,620 --> 00:50:11,220 the both articles in in the longer form 1090 00:50:15,980 --> 00:50:12,630 of books there's lots of videos that 1091 00:50:18,050 --> 00:50:15,990 people can find on on YouTube so you are 1092 00:50:21,500 --> 00:50:18,060 out there and I have to admit I'm not 1093 00:50:23,540 --> 00:50:21,510 very good media savvy so I don't really 1094 00:50:25,550 --> 00:50:23,550 know what things are on YouTube or not 1095 00:50:27,860 --> 00:50:25,560 but might you know I'm told by my 1096 00:50:30,950 --> 00:50:27,870 students that that's it's an easy thing 1097 00:50:35,390 --> 00:50:30,960 to find oh yeah oh yeah you're out there 1098 00:50:37,430 --> 00:50:35,400 and and there's I I don't do you know 1099 00:50:40,100 --> 00:50:37,440 blogging or anything of that sort I 1100 00:50:42,410 --> 00:50:40,110 really find computers kind of depressing 1101 00:50:45,050 --> 00:50:42,420 and and the cyber world kind of dull and 1102 00:50:46,970 --> 00:50:45,060 I prefer I'm just I mean I think I'm 1103 00:50:49,730 --> 00:50:46,980 just a few years too old to have the 1104 00:50:52,930 --> 00:50:49,740 right kind of enthusiasm for that so I'm 1105 00:50:56,600 --> 00:50:52,940 afraid the publication rather than daily 1106 00:50:58,580 --> 00:50:56,610 articles well it's a but it's been 1107 00:51:00,470 --> 00:50:58,590 absolutely great talking to you and 1108 00:51:03,230 --> 00:51:00,480 digging into your work I'm super excited 1109 00:51:05,270 --> 00:51:03,240 to hear about your book on consciousness 1110 00:51:07,340 --> 00:51:05,280 and the further exploration of the 1111 00:51:09,350 --> 00:51:07,350 philosophical underpinnings of it so 1112 00:51:11,360 --> 00:51:09,360 we'll keep an eye out for that and if 1113 00:51:14,570 --> 00:51:11,370 you're up for it would love to have you 1114 00:51:40,380 --> 00:51:14,580 back on to talk about that one too okay 1115 00:51:45,670 --> 00:51:43,120 thanks again to dr. David Bentley Hart 1116 00:51:47,519 --> 00:51:45,680 for joining me today on skeptic oh I'd T 1117 00:51:50,799 --> 00:51:47,529 up one question from this interview 1118 00:51:53,890 --> 00:51:50,809 extraordinary for ordinary dr. Hart says 1119 00:51:56,620 --> 00:51:53,900 that he's explicitly drawn his attention 1120 00:51:58,900 --> 00:51:56,630 away from extraordinary human 1121 00:52:00,400 --> 00:51:58,910 consciousness and E's medium 1122 00:52:01,539 --> 00:52:00,410 communication out-of-body travel 1123 00:52:04,029 --> 00:52:01,549 whatever ever you want to go with that 1124 00:52:07,420 --> 00:52:04,039 he said instead we should look at our 1125 00:52:10,089 --> 00:52:07,430 ordinary experiences with everyday 1126 00:52:13,390 --> 00:52:10,099 consciousness and the extraordinariness 1127 00:52:15,430 --> 00:52:13,400 of that ordinary consciousness it's an 1128 00:52:17,769 --> 00:52:15,440 interesting idea especially given the 1129 00:52:19,269 --> 00:52:17,779 topics we cover here on skeptic oh so 1130 00:52:22,480 --> 00:52:19,279 I'd like to hear what you think about 1131 00:52:24,039 --> 00:52:22,490 that extraordinary or ordinary of course 1132 00:52:25,569 --> 00:52:24,049 the place to let me know what you're 1133 00:52:30,999 --> 00:52:25,579 thinking is through this skeptical 1134 00:52:32,470 --> 00:52:31,009 website at ske PTI koat.com from there 1135 00:52:34,990 --> 00:52:32,480 you can bounce on over the forum and 1136 00:52:37,480 --> 00:52:35,000 join us in the dialogue there or send me 1137 00:52:39,339 --> 00:52:37,490 an email send me a facebook however you 1138 00:52:41,349 --> 00:52:39,349 want to connect with me I'll try and 1139 00:52:42,970 --> 00:52:41,359 respond of course while you're at the 1140 00:52:45,430 --> 00:52:42,980 web site you can check out all the 1141 00:52:47,319 --> 00:52:45,440 previous almost 300 shows a skeptic oh 1142 00:52:49,329 --> 00:52:47,329 you can download them subscribe to them 1143 00:52:50,890 --> 00:52:49,339 I hope you do all that stuff you can 1144 00:52:52,630 --> 00:52:50,900 subscribe to the newsletter where we'll 1145 00:52:54,549 --> 00:52:52,640 keep you up to date and when a new 1146 00:52:56,019 --> 00:52:54,559 episode comes out so that might be 1147 00:52:58,029 --> 00:52:56,029 something you want to check out as well 1148 00:53:00,220 --> 00:52:58,039 I do have some great shows coming up 1149 00:53:02,289 --> 00:53:00,230 many of them have been suggested to me 1150 00:53:04,990 --> 00:53:02,299 by you and by the way if you have a 1151 00:53:06,880 --> 00:53:05,000 suggestion for a guest email me let me 1152 00:53:09,849 --> 00:53:06,890 know I can't guarantee that we'll always 1153 00:53:11,049 --> 00:53:09,859 do the show you suggest and you might 1154 00:53:13,150 --> 00:53:11,059 have to sell me a little bit on that 1155 00:53:15,430 --> 00:53:13,160 along the way but that's a fun part of 1156 00:53:18,400 --> 00:53:15,440 the process as well the main thing is to 1157 00:53:20,230 --> 00:53:18,410 stay in touch stay connected take this 1158 00:53:23,370 --> 00:53:20,240 little skeptical experiment where you 1159 00:53:26,019 --> 00:53:23,380 want it to go by getting involved or 1160 00:53:27,849 --> 00:53:26,029 don't get involved and just stick around 1161 00:53:30,309 --> 00:53:27,859 because we did have some good shows 1162 00:53:32,410 --> 00:53:30,319 coming up as I just mentioned well 1163 00:53:35,259 --> 00:53:32,420 that's gonna do it for this Christmas 1164 00:53:36,090 --> 00:53:35,269 episode of skeptic oh it is just a few 1165 00:53:39,000 --> 00:53:36,100 days 1166 00:53:40,710 --> 00:53:39,010 for Christmas as I record this so Merry 1167 00:53:43,650 --> 00:53:40,720 Christmas Happy Holidays all that stuff 1168 00:53:46,410 --> 00:53:43,660 the main thing is enjoy the break and 1169 00:54:05,420 --> 00:53:46,420 until next time take care and bye for